- Home
- /NIW
- /Requirements
- /Balancing the Factors
Why It Benefits the U.S. to Waive the Job Offer
The third requirement — a weighing, not a checklist, and the only prong that asks about the labor certification itself.
The first two prongs establish that the work matters and that you can advance it. The third asks something different: is the country better off letting this petition skip the job offer and the labor certification than making it go through them? Labor certification exists to protect the job opportunities, wages, and working conditions of U.S. workers, and this prong is where those interests get weighed against the benefits of your endeavor. It is also the prong petitions most often treat as a formality.
Who this page is for
Read this if you have a real endeavor and a real record and now have to explain why the job offer and labor certification should be set aside — founders and self-employed people, and employed professionals who have been told, wrongly, that a willing employer rules out a waiver.
What is actually being waived
EB-2 ordinarily runs through the Department of Labor. Every petition in the classification has to arrive with an individual labor certification, or with a Schedule A application where one applies. That certification is a labor-market test with a defined purpose: making sure the admission of foreign workers does not adversely affect the job opportunities, wages, and working conditions of U.S. workers — in what is usually a geographically limited labor market.
The waiver removes that step. A petition filed with a waiver request does not need a job offer behind it, so you file as a self-petitioner, and waiving the job offer waives the permanent labor certification requirement along with it. One piece of paperwork survives: you still submit the employee-specific portions of a labor certification, Form ETA-750B or Form ETA-9089, but nothing goes to the Department of Labor for approval. 8 C.F.R. section 204.5(k)(4).
The balance Congress set up
Dhanasar frames the tension without resolving it in advance. Congress required job offers and labor certifications to protect the domestic labor supply. Congress also created the national interest waiver, recognizing that in certain cases the benefits built into the labor certification process are outweighed by other things that are themselves in the national interest. Neither impulse wins automatically. Matter of Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. 884, 890-91 (AAO 2016).
USCIS describes the same weighing in operational terms. The officer takes your endeavor and your ability to advance it together, and asks whether waiving the labor certification requirement delivers a benefit to the country that outweighs the benefits ordinarily flowing from that requirement. The comparison is the entire prong.
The factors on your side of the scale
Dhanasar names three considerations. First, whether — given the nature of your qualifications or your proposed endeavor — it would be impractical either for you to secure a job offer or for a petitioner to obtain a labor certification. Second, whether the United States would still benefit from your contributions even assuming other qualified U.S. workers are available. Third, whether the national interest in your contributions is urgent enough to warrant forgoing the labor certification process. 26 I&N Dec. at 890-91. USCIS gives urgency a concrete shape — a time-sensitive public health or safety benefit offered by the endeavor — and adds further considerations of its own.
- Whether the labor certification process may prevent an employer from hiring someone with unique knowledge or skills exceeding the minimum requirements standard for the occupation. An employer may list only the minimum job requirements on such an application, so anything above them is invisible to the process.
- Whether the endeavor has the potential to generate considerable economic impact, consistent for example with economic revitalization.
- Whether the endeavor may lead to potential job creation. USCIS Policy Manual, 6 USCIS-PM F.5(D)(3).
What this prong does not require
Dhanasar deliberately lightened the third prong. Unlike the third prong of the framework it replaced, this one does not require a showing of harm to the national interest, and it does not compare you against U.S. workers in your field. 26 I&N Dec. at 890-91. You do not have to argue the country would be damaged if you went through labor certification, and there is no hypothetical American you are being measured against. Advice built on those requirements is running on a superseded test.
A willing employer does not disqualify you either. Nothing precludes a person from seeking a national interest waiver because that person's employer has applied, or could apply, to the Department of Labor for a labor certification. The availability of a sponsorship path is simply not an answer to the question this prong asks.
A labor shortage is not an argument here
This is the most common misfire on the third prong, and the guidance closes it in one line: evidence of a national labor shortage in your occupation would not, by itself, satisfy this prong. USCIS Policy Manual, 6 USCIS-PM F.5(D)(3). The same reasoning runs through the first prong, where proposing to work in a shortage occupation is likewise insufficient on its own. A shortage is a fact about a labor market. This prong asks about you and your endeavor.
Entrepreneurs and the self-employed
For founders the impracticality factor is not rhetorical. Dhanasar recognizes that it may be impractical for an entrepreneur or self-employed inventor, advancing an endeavor on his or her own, to secure a job offer from a U.S. employer. 26 I&N Dec. at 891 n.10. There is no employer to sponsor a person who is building the employer.
USCIS reaches the same place from the other direction. Where someone is self-employed in a manner that generally does not adversely affect U.S. workers, or establishes or owns a business that provides jobs for U.S. workers, there may be little benefit in requiring a labor certification at all.
The waiver is discretionary
Meeting the three prongs establishes eligibility. It does not compel a grant. USCIS may grant a national interest waiver as a matter of discretion where the petitioner demonstrates eligibility by a preponderance of the evidence, and the burden stays with the petitioner throughout. Every petition is considered on a case-by-case basis. USCIS Policy Manual, 6 USCIS-PM F.5(D)(2).
Ready to discuss your case?
Schedule a consultation with Loren Locke to see if this visa is the right fit.
Schedule a ConsultationThe questions an officer is actually answering
Why should this case skip the labor market test? The officer weighs your endeavor and your position to advance it against the benefits of requiring a labor certification, so the answer has to be specific to you rather than to your field.
Is there something the process cannot capture? An employer may list only the minimum job requirements, which is why unique knowledge or skills exceeding that standard is a named factor.
Is the timing doing any work? Urgency wants a reason the national interest cannot wait. Petitions are decided one record at a time.
What tends to answer those questions
For founders and self-employed petitioners: documentation of the ownership and role structure that makes a job offer impractical, and of U.S. jobs the venture supports or will support.
For employed professionals: material showing what the position requires beyond the minimum requirements an occupation's labor certification could state.
For urgency: dated, external evidence — a deployment window, a funding deadline, a public health or safety timeline. An assertion that the work matters now will not carry the factor.
Where they exist, letters from interested government agencies or quasi-governmental entities addressed to urgency and national benefit instead of general excellence.
How we handle this
This prong gets drafted as a comparison. A section that restates the first two prongs in a different order is the version officers dispose of in a sentence.
We argue only the named factors your facts actually support. Claiming urgency without a timeline spends credibility the rest of the petition needs.
Labor-shortage material stays out of this section, because a national shortage does not satisfy this prong by itself.
Related pages
Frequently Asked Questions
Other EB-2 NIW Resources
By Profession
How physicians, engineers, researchers, founders, and others build an EB-2 NIW case.
ExploreFor Physicians
The two physician waivers — the three-prong test and the statutory five-year shortage-area route — plus the J-1 layer.
ExploreTopic Deep-Dives
Processing time, premium processing, priority dates, cost, RFEs, and what happens after approval.
ExploreScenarios
Real situations: an RFE on a self-filed petition, a denial, a pending PERM, a later EB-1A.
ExploreCompare Other Paths
EB-2 NIW measured against EB-1A, employer-sponsored EB-2, EB-1B, and the O-1A.
ExploreArgue the third prong instead of assuming it
Is an employer-sponsored green card also on the table? We can walk through how the balancing reads on your facts and which route is the stronger one for you.
Immigration counsel to Fortune 500 employers at a national firm · Adjudicated 12,000+ visas at the U.S. Consulate, Mexico · Working in U.S. immigration since 2008
Featured in Newsweek, Condé Nast Traveler, Daily Mail