- Home
- /NIW
- /By Profession
- /Entrepreneurs and Founders
EB-2 NIW for Entrepreneurs and Founders
The national interest waiver lets a founder self-petition — no employer, no sponsorship. The petitions that work argue the startup, not the category.
Most employment-based green cards require an employer sponsor — a structural problem for a founder, whose employer is the company being built. The EB-2 national interest waiver removes it: no job offer is needed, so the founder may self-petition, and the USCIS Policy Manual devotes a section specifically to entrepreneurs. It also carries the warning that decides these cases: not every entrepreneur qualifies, and broad claims about entrepreneurs creating jobs establish nothing. What succeeds is a documented, specific venture — a detailed business plan, outside investment, real progress, letters from the people betting on it.
Who this page is for
You are building the company that would otherwise have to sponsor you. Founders, co-founders, and self-employed professionals belong here — funded and operating, or still at the detailed-plan stage.
If you are employed by someone else's company, see our page for business professionals.
A green card without an employer
EB-2 normally requires a job offer and a Department of Labor labor certification. The statute lets USCIS waive both when it deems the waiver in the national interest. 8 U.S.C. section 1153(b)(2)(B)(i). No job offer means the founder files as a self-petitioner; the only labor-certification paperwork is the employee-specific portion of the form (ETA 750B or ETA 9089), and it is never filed with or approved by the Department of Labor.
The framework was rebuilt with entrepreneurs in mind. Matter of Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. 884 (AAO 2016), which sets the governing three-part test, observed that "it may be impractical for an entrepreneur or self-employed inventor, when advancing an endeavor on his or her own, to secure a job offer from a U.S. employer." 26 I&N Dec. at 891 n.10. The Policy Manual agrees: where a person is self-employed in a way that generally does not adversely affect U.S. workers, or owns a business providing jobs for U.S. workers, there may be little benefit from the labor certification.
The trap: arguing from the category
The Policy Manual's entrepreneur section opens with a warning: "Not every entrepreneur qualifies for a national interest waiver." Broad assertions about general economic benefits and potential job creation will not establish qualification. USCIS Policy Manual, 6 USCIS-PM F.5(D)(6).
The Manual's examples show what fails. Evidence of an industry's overall importance — its example is the car dealership industry — will not demonstrate that a person opening a business in that industry satisfies national importance. Nor can an entrepreneur establish it solely by opening a consulting firm for those working or seeking to work in a nationally important occupation. And a petition involving a startup company has to demonstrate in detail how that specific endeavor meets the national interest requirement.
What USCIS credits: plan, money, progress, believers
The entrepreneur section lists the evidence officers weigh, and it reads like a diligence checklist. Ownership, and an active and central role in the U.S. entity. Credentials showing the founder can run this particular venture. Outside investment in amounts consistent with industry standards, judged against what the endeavor actually needs in capital. Admission to an incubator or accelerator, which officers may treat as an endorsement. Awards and grants. Intellectual property significant to the field. Media coverage. Revenue growth and U.S. job creation tied to the founder's contribution. USCIS Policy Manual, 6 USCIS-PM F.5(D)(6).
The business plan anchors the second prong — whether you are well positioned to advance the endeavor. A detailed plan the founder developed, progress toward it, and the interest or support garnered from potential customers, users, investors, or other relevant entities are all listed factors. But a plan alone is not a case: business plans, while useful in explaining the person's objectives, should be supported by other independent evidence — a record that fits the plan, steps actually taken, and corroborated projections.
Letters carry real weight because startups skip academic peer review. The Manual treats review by prospective investors, retailers, and industry experts as the substitute: third-party letters from people with direct knowledge may have probative value across all three prongs.
Your company does not have to be a sure thing
USCIS does not require proof the startup will succeed. Dhanasar acknowledged that "many innovations and entrepreneurial endeavors may ultimately fail, in whole or in part, despite an intelligent plan and competent execution" and held that petitioners need not show their endeavors are more likely than not to succeed. 26 I&N Dec. at 890. The Policy Manual adds that success on typical startup metrics is favorable but not required, and that there is no single way a venture must be structured.
What is required is corroboration. Unsupported claims do not meet the burden of proof, and company ownership rarely establishes eligibility on its own. Founder-market fit gets tested too: a person whose banking experience is limited to working as a teller or accounts manager may not be well positioned to launch a consultancy advising banks nationally.
The gate founders miss: qualifying for EB-2 itself
The waiver sits on top of EB-2, so you have to qualify first as an advanced-degree professional or a person of exceptional ability — and for founders that turns on the occupation underlying the venture, not the diploma. The Manual's example: an engineer with an advanced degree proposing an engineering endeavor may qualify, but the same person opening a bakery may not, because the occupation of baker does not typically require a bachelor's degree. "The occupation underlying the endeavor is determinative." USCIS Policy Manual, 6 USCIS-PM F.5(D)(1).
A master's degree is not the only way in. A bachelor's plus at least five years of progressive experience in the specialty counts as a master's equivalent, and the alternative path is exceptional ability in business directly related to the endeavor.
Ready to discuss your case?
Schedule a consultation with Loren Locke to see if this visa is the right fit.
Schedule a ConsultationThe questions an officer is actually answering
What, specifically, will this company do? An endeavor is more specific than an occupation or an industry, and a startup petition has to demonstrate in detail how that specific endeavor meets the national interest requirement. USCIS Policy Manual, 6 USCIS-PM F.5(D)(3).
Who besides you believes in it? The evidence list is dominated by external validation — investors, accelerators, grant-makers, customers. A petition built on the founder's own projections invites the finding that unsubstantiated claims do not meet the burden of proof.
Does your background fit this plan? General experience in a field may not show you are well positioned to build a company in it; the bank-teller example is the officer's template.
What tends to answer those questions
A detailed business plan the founder developed — market, model, milestones — paired with independent evidence corroborating its projections. USCIS Policy Manual, 6 USCIS-PM F.5(D)(6).
Corporate and funding records: ownership documents, the founder's officer role, term sheets or commitments from investors in amounts appropriate to the endeavor's capital needs.
Progress evidence: incubator or accelerator admission, pilot agreements, contracts, licenses, early revenue or hiring tied to the founder's contribution.
Intellectual property held by the founder or company, documented as significant to the field or endeavor.
Letters from investors, customers, government entities, or business associations with first-hand knowledge of the product or founder.
For regionally focused ventures, evidence of significant potential to employ U.S. workers, or other economic effects significant relative to the area, particularly an economically depressed one.
How we handle this
Everything starts with how the endeavor is framed. It has to be specific enough to escape the category trap, and drawn so that its implications reach past the company itself. That framing decides what the plan must prove.
We build the record around external validation — investment, accelerator admission, grants, customer commitments, third-party letters. That is the evidence the Policy Manual credits; founder self-description is not.
We pressure-test the draft against the Manual's own failure examples — car dealership, consulting firm, job-creation generalities, the bank-teller mismatch — and rewrite anything an officer could dismiss with one.
And we tell you before filing if the venture is not ready. Sometimes the right sequence is a funding round or a pilot first, then the petition.
Frequently Asked Questions
Other EB-2 NIW Resources
Requirements
The EB-2 threshold and the three-part waiver test — one page per question.
ExploreFor Physicians
The two physician waivers — the three-prong test and the statutory five-year shortage-area route — plus the J-1 layer.
ExploreTopic Deep-Dives
Processing time, premium processing, priority dates, cost, RFEs, and what happens after approval.
ExploreScenarios
Real situations: an RFE on a self-filed petition, a denial, a pending PERM, a later EB-1A.
ExploreCompare Other Paths
EB-2 NIW measured against EB-1A, employer-sponsored EB-2, EB-1B, and the O-1A.
ExplorePut the venture in front of an attorney
We look at the plan, the money in, and who outside the company has already backed it. From there you will know whether this is a case to file now or a record to build first.
Immigration counsel to Fortune 500 employers at a national firm · Adjudicated 12,000+ visas at the U.S. Consulate, Mexico · Working in U.S. immigration since 2008
Featured in Newsweek, Condé Nast Traveler, Daily Mail