The petitioner has received a denial of an H-1B petition — an initial cap-subject filing, a transfer, an extension, or a change of status — and is evaluating whether the EB-1A self-petition is a viable alternative. The status posture is the threshold question: whether the petitioner is currently in a period of authorized stay, whether the 60-day grace period applies, and whether departure or a status change is required.
This page is for a professional whose H-1B was denied and who is weighing EB-1A. EB-1A is a self-petition judged under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h), independent of the H-1B standard, but it confers no status. Whether prior status survives, the 60-day grace period applies, and unlawful presence is accruing is the threshold question.
The H-1B denial itself does not, by operation of law, terminate the petitioner's lawful status; the effect on status depends on what was denied and what status the petitioner held before. A denied H-1B transfer leaves the petitioner in the prior H-1B status with the prior employer, if that employment is still in place. A denied initial cap-subject petition with a change-of-status request means no H-1B status was ever granted. A denied extension can leave the petitioner without underlying status as of the date of the prior I-94 expiration.
The 60-day grace period at 8 C.F.R. § 214.1(l)(2) applies in narrow circumstances — principally where an H-1B worker's employment is terminated before the end of the authorized period of stay. It is not a general post-denial grace period. Where it applies, the worker has up to 60 consecutive days, or the remaining period of authorized stay (whichever is shorter), to find new employment, change status, or depart.
Once status lapses, the petitioner accrues unlawful presence for purposes of the three- and ten-year inadmissibility bars under INA § 212(a)(9)(B). The accrual rules differ for petitioners under 18, for those who hold pending applications in certain postures, and for those who depart and re-enter.
The EB-1A self-petition under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h) does not confer status. Filing an I-140 does not create a period of authorized stay, and an approved I-140 alone does not create a non-immigrant status. A concurrent or downstream I-485 adjustment of status application requires the petitioner to be in a qualifying status at the time of filing in most cases, though INA § 245(k) provides a narrow exception for employment-based applicants.
Premium processing on the EB-1A is available under 8 C.F.R. § 103.7(e) and has a 15-business-day service commitment.
The denied petition was a transfer or extension, and the petitioner remains in valid H-1B status with the prior employer.
The cleanest posture. The EB-1A is filed as a self-petition while the petitioner remains in employer-based H-1B status. The two are independent: the EB-1A does not require employer sponsorship and does not affect the H-1B. We have advised petitioners to maintain the prior H-1B employment relationship through the EB-1A adjudication where feasible, both for status and for documentation of continued work in the field.
The petitioner is in the 60-day grace period or has otherwise lost work authorization but wants to remain in the U.S. pending EB-1A adjudication.
A change of status to B-2 visitor is sometimes used as a bridge, though it is not a guaranteed approval and does not authorize work. The petitioner has to articulate the visitor purpose in good faith. We have seen B-2 changes of status approved and denied; the documentation of the reason for the visit matters. A B-2 bridge does not solve the longer-term work-authorization problem; it buys time.
The petitioner has lost status and prefers to avoid further accrual of unlawful presence, or returns home for personal or work reasons.
Where work authorization is gone and a B-2 bridge is not feasible or desired, departure resets the status calculus. The EB-1A can be filed and adjudicated while the petitioner is abroad. After approval, the petitioner pursues consular processing at a U.S. embassy or consulate rather than adjustment of status. This avoids further unlawful presence accrual but adds consular processing time and the visa interview process.
The petitioner is in valid status, the EB-1A priority date is current, and the petitioner wants to begin adjustment of status immediately.
Where the visa bulletin shows the EB-1A category current for the petitioner's chargeability, an I-140 and I-485 can be filed concurrently. This generates a pending I-485, which carries an Employment Authorization Document and Advance Parole and protects against further status problems while pending. The EB-1A petitioner has to be in qualifying status at the time of filing in most cases. Concurrent filing is risky where status is already gone or about to lapse.
The petitioner's record may support an O-1, an L-1, an E-2, or another non-immigrant classification, and continued U.S. work is the priority.
An H-1B denial does not foreclose other non-immigrant categories. The O-1 in particular has substantial evidentiary overlap with the EB-1A under 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(o)(3) — though the O-1 is for the duration of the activity rather than permanent residence and requires an employer or agent. Where work continuity is the binding constraint, pursuing an O-1 in parallel with the EB-1A is sometimes the right approach.
You'll hear back within 48 hours whenever a petition is being drafted or an RFE is on the clock. No ghosting.
Every petition is drafted from a fresh interview-extracted fact sheet. We don't recycle petitions or rec letters across unrelated clients.
We file on every criterion we can credibly defend. When a criterion is thin, we fold it into "Original Contributions of Major Significance" rather than stand it up as its own weak argument.
RFE response is a separate flat fee of $2,000 to $5,000, quoted before any work begins. Strategy consultations, whether-to-respond conversations, and post-denial planning are not billed hourly.
We use a structured SOAR (Situation, Obstacle, Action, Result) interview process to understand the client's actual work, including in technical and niche fields where the record doesn't speak for itself.
We draft reference letters from the interview and evidence review — included in the petition fee — then coordinate with recommenders for signature. We don't leave recommenders to produce their own letters.
RFEs aren't surprises. Every petition is drafted with our standing RFE response framework in mind so that if an RFE lands, we're executing a plan, not starting from scratch.
The initial call is a candid read on whether the case is defensible — not a pitch. If we think the profile doesn't support EB-1A right now, we'll tell you.
Tell us about your immigration needs and we'll be in touch to discuss how we can help.
Immigration counsel to Fortune 500 employers at a national firm · Adjudicated 12,000+ visas at the U.S. Consulate, Mexico · Working in U.S. immigration since 2008
Featured in Newsweek, Condé Nast Traveler, Daily Mail